So Republican Mike Leara had the stones to write a bill that makes it a Class D felony for Missouri State Legislators to propose legislation that outlaws the exercise of a Constitutional right.
So let me get this straight: the Constitution enumerates the natural right for man to defend himself against the ever-expanding oppressive control of government. The Constitution even says, very clearly, that said right “shall not be infringed.”
Now let’s take a look at the dictionary definition of the word “infringe”: to commit a breach or infraction of, to violate, to encroach upon. From the Latin infringere: to break or weaken.
All of that suggests that any alteration to the 2nd Amendment, any encroachment, any attempt to break or weaken the enumerated right therein, constitutes infringement. Which means that any law written with the express purpose of limiting 2nd Amendment rights is on its face unconstitutional.
What Missouri Democrats would like you to believe, however, is that their treasonous attempt to undermine your rights as outlined in the 2nd Amendment is somehow less newsworthy than the efforts of the guy who suggests that it might be criminal for an elected official to pervert and infringe the constitution to further a political narrative.
A quick review:
Republican Mike Leara says it should be a crime for legislators to violate the Constitution.
Missouri Democrats say it should be a crime for citizens to exercise a Constitutional right.
And we're supposed to believe that the Democrats are on the right side of this one?